Beforehand I thank those
who can correct mistakes in grammar!!!
Tuberculosis and
inadequate situation with Mantoux
As causing for a spelling of present article the
stuff has served "do not make to us mantoux (the author - Svetlana Borisova.); published in the newspaper the Komsomol truth of
Ukraine, on December, 12, 2006; and article Ukraine
is powerless before a tuberculosis from the section "Medicine
in Ukraine"; in which intercommunicates that
10 % of patients with a tuberculosis in Ukraine are compounded by patients with
a so-called drug-resistant tuberculosis which not undergo in to treatment even
the most strong and toxiferous preparations.
To conversation about a situation
around of mantoux we shall return below for now we
shall talk about a situation of tuberculosis.
Still recently the situation about a tuberculosis was
paid attention with summit of "Eight" that allows to draw a conclusion
about the extremely bad position with a problem of a tuberculosis not only in
And in a month (October, 2006) experts speak that, diffusion
of drug resistant forms of a tuberculosis in the East
Europe and the Central Asia (
In the beginning
The last century the global program on struggle against tuberculosis DOTS has been elaborated. And in September,
Despite of these facts, experts of the World Health
Organization are sure; that by 2015 the new effective and safe vaccine from
tuberculosis will be created. By words of adviser on questions of a
tuberculosis of the European regional bureau WHO, Richard Zahleskis's: the
developed 80 years ago and used vaccine till now all over the world does not
protect from tuberculosis. Not clear and how reports on the
built new vaccines for these years? And it is not clear: on the basis of that
experts build new forecasts, if analogous vaccines already during long years,
unfortunately, are not justified yet?
The
conclusion arises: Till now all efforts in struggle
against tuberculosis have been directed exclusively on quests of medicines for
liquidation of a bacillus Kokh's micobacteria; but they
not get crowned success??? And can, one-sided efforts
are simply incorrect? What to do in such situation?
In article
That it
is necessary to make to stop development of a tuberculosis? M.Alhazirgov writes that the Tuberculosis is an insidious disease which develops gradually. Therefore
at appearance of signs, suspicious on tuberculosis, it is necessary to address
in the nearest medical establishment. The organization of
preventive medical surveys of the population the basic step in struggle
against tuberculosis. And, first of all, everyone needs to show
insistence to itself and to associates; to take on
arms key rules, to not give to develop this illness . But in fact these
measures in anything have not resulted; the situation with tuberculosis
continues to worsen. Indeed M.Alhazirgov of it does
not know? So, Richard Zahleskis the adviser the WHO, marks, that
annually in the world is recorded 370 thousand again revealed patients by
tuberculosis.
In the
nearest years on struggle against
a tuberculosis in the world is
necessary about 56 billion dollars, has declared the principal of a
department of partnership "To stop a tuberculosis", Sara Ingland. Cabinet
of Ukraine in 2007-2011 is going to
strengthen struggle with diffusion
of a tuberculosis. The government has affirmed the Concept of the national
program of counteraction to disease by tuberculosis in 2007-2011; and has
entrusted Ministry of Health to submit till June, 30 on treating of the
government the design of the State program of counteraction to disease by
tuberculosis in 2007-2011.
But really nobody sees, what, accepted till now one-sided measures (which are directed exclusively on
struggle against a micobacterium), not only anything
not do in amelioration of situation,
and on the contrary? Really is not obvious, what there is a struggle only with
a micobacterium, but non with a tuberculosis?
So What to do?
It would be desirable to concentrate attention on one interesting stuff from S.M.Gordienko's
article, c..s., Tuberculosis. An assessment of a situation. The author marks, that epidemy
of tuberculosis, is more and more distributed in the countries of East and
S.M.Gordienko explains
that, the growing inefficiency of the antibiotics used in therapy of bacilluss
dangerous to life, concerns to the causes of epidemy
also. Scientists ascertain, that is more
and more cultures of tubercular bacillus become resistant in
relation to antitubercular vaccines - quite often at
once to all four kinds of medical products which are included in medical
"cocktail".
It is especially marked, that the new purposes, new
designs and the new ministerial declaration have been announced in 2000 on
And
if to trust recent research the WHO, the nearest years the situation only will
be aggravated because practically it is impossible to confine "wild
outburst" of the multiresistant exciter. And the
facts today confirm it. Experts unanimously consider, that the main source of a
new infection it is basically are patients with the
open form of tuberculosis.
The employee of the Ukrainian bureau a WHO
supervising a problem of tuberculosis, doctor Kestutis
Measkinis has noted: Rates of
growth of infection a HIV and morbidity of tuberculosis in
Today it is possible to give enough statements about
a negative situation with tuberculosis. But
while, nobody can precisely answer (it clearly from a plenty of various
publications) - why there is such situation?
Now we
shall return to a question on an inadequate situation with reactions of Mantoux. In the newspaper the Mirror of week 15 from
April, 22, interesting article - Belated reaction of Mantoux is placed. If to be more frank,
reaction of experts as it is impossible to name overdue; even, in spite of the
fact that they have really made the reasonable and cardinal - correct decision
on an interdiction of antitubercular inoculations. Experts cannot explain the cause of the next negative phenomenon. Precisely the same as they cannot explain many obvious
facts which are included into the contradiction with the modern theory of
tuberculosis.
The surprising facts are marked in this article: experts the WHO repeatedly lifted a question about that the revaccination
from Kokh's bacillus already for a long time does not
give expected result; as ill with tuberculosis almost identical part as
revaccination, and not-revaccination people. And if to this
to add also such real facts which the medical science also cannot explain; that
a grafted people from tuberculosis are ill a more serious forms of
tuberculosis, than not-grafted ??? One it already gives a ground to Ministry
of Health to refuse engraftings on tuberculosis.
There is no necessity to search today guilty how, as
we it is doing. Is possible to tell firmly, that the fault in
a situation with a Mantoux is not-present neither at
producers of a tuberculin, nor at transport workers which transported him,
neither at keepers of this vaccine, nor at medical staff which immediately
effected inoculations. The cause - in other.
And this quite weighed and a substantiated conclusion.
In KT of Ukraine from December, 12 of year (as it
was marked in the beginning) the most interesting article Do
not make to us mantoux! has been
placed. In article is marked: in
Till now
the proved answer on this situation and has not followed. As always
experts tried to find the respondent from the side. Unfortunately, only experts assumptions have been stated that to all by fault seasonal
circulation of viruses of an acute respiratory infection; also that the error
consist that have inoculated to children when the manifestation of diseases
caused by the given virus, yet was not. But, as have shown the subsequent
events, other "fresh" viruses of the Epstein-Bore
forest and a cytomegalovirus later have been found in some children in an
organism.
Despite of answers of Ministry of Health, parents
continue to count; what is the infections have been brought, when inoculated Mantoux. It is necessary to tell, that
parents too are not right. Expert of Ministry of Health (S.Kramarev)
in specified article, categorically deny fault of physicians. On a question -
whether is dangerous Mantoux? - S.Kramarev do answering, that if the
child is able-bodied, the Mantoux is not dangerous; to refuse a Mantoux's test
does not cost, as she is a unique method to trace illness at an early stage.
So in what the real cause of a situation
with engraftings Mantoux? That is marked
in a scientific-methodical stuff about a vaccine-prevention
which is official for use in medicine:
- Till now
the mechanism of interaction of a tuberculin with immune system is unknown;
- The
tuberculin is (most likely) an allergen;
- In itself
the positive Mantoux test is not 100 % the proof of infection tuberculosis.
Really
experts of it do not know? Why then they hold back and taciturn. Not clear,
then Mantoux tests what for are necessary?
Some scientists nevertheless try to tell the truth
about a real state of affairs. That the doctor of sciences, the professor -
virologist, G.P.Chervonskaja, writes about
vaccination (bacterination):
- Is
impossible to liquidate any infectious disease only with the help of engraftings.
There is a obsession of devil: without
inoculation the child is such as incomplete; though actually - absolutely on
the contrary;
- For example, at a diphtheria, in case of
circulation of the exciter among the population, the
phenomenon of a "household" immunization is marked, that is of immunodefence by natural way without marked disease.
Therefore, including adult population, to vaccinate is possible and
is necessary only after diagnostics - careful questioning and medical
inspection. And our
system of engraftings reduces titers of available
antibodies (takes out protection), and "bared" susceptible people to subsequent
their encounter with a diphtheria;
- Nowhere more in the world vaccination of BCG to neonatal, except for
Today many doctors write that it is better to not make vaccination, than to do injurious to health of
the child. Rampant vaccination, in such kind what she now it's, we carry out
large-scale experiment with the population of our country, not thinking at all
that it has already resulted in eco-catastrophe in HEALTH. Now not only parents beat alarm, but also experts who do not try to
conceal a real situation around of vaccination.
But a little who speaks about the real cause
of negative consequences. I shall try to express personal
opinion on this question:
- First, always
fault shift on executors. Executors are guilty not; and those who asserts
protocols (rules) of vaccination.
- Second,
really, nothing so does not develop immunodefence, as
true illness. Therefore the majority of engraftings
are SIMPLY NONEFFECTIVE; and, besides they can cause this or that pathology.
- Thirdly,
in itself the tuberculin for an organism is a foreign substance. Is it
possible that experts do not know; what either of the foreign substance will launch
protective immune response in an organism which can develop some by a pathology?... (it is one of principal causes
of inadequate reaction with Mantoux).
- Fourthly,
everyone know, that any vaccines is an additional load
on an organism. It is one more of principal causes because of which there are
negative reactions with a Mantoux reaction; and with
other engraftings too.
- Fifthly, any weakened organism struggles with an external infection on
the verge of risk to be ill. And here we bring in one more external additional
infection! Here to
you and result.
The negative situation with a Mantoux
in
Today because of that the majority of the
population lives behind a limit of a living wage and many do not receive a
sufficient food; a plenty of organisms are on the verge of disease, i.e. are
weakened. Many products (it is repeatedly confirmed with mass-media) are
forged. And unless it is possible to inoculate the unhealthy
or weakened organism? The most terrible that
calendars of vaccination no a season, no a real situation in the country, do
not take into account.
Is it possible, that experts do not know, that
immune cells of our organism not only do not destroy a micobacterium,
and on the contrary, protect her. The immune system
liquidates only DAMAGED micobacteria.
The classical science today does not know the answer
to this phenomenon!!! And we in fact bring in organism
the damaged micobacteria, at a Mantoux;
and to be exact - extracts from them. The Mantoux
really "is not dangerous" only to able-bodied people. In any case,
the Mantoux, as well as vaccination of BCG, will cause seen or invisible negative result.
And how the
immune system can develop immunodefence against a micobacterium when she protects a bacillus Kokh's? Then in
what sense of antitubercular vaccination and Mantoux?
Taking into
account the aforesaid, it is possible to draw a conclusion: here is no necessity in Mantoux which is not the proof of infection a micobacteria; no in vaccination of BCG. It - the real truth; the medical science has no enough some the weighty
establishments to define a micobacterium to the
contagious exciter.
All named above, are the important causes of a
negative situation both with tuberculosis in general, and with inadequate
reaction with Mantoux. But
it not is the main thing. In what a
matter, then? Once again we sharpen the basic questions which
arise around of tuberculosis.
Why, despite of appreciable efforts in struggle against a tuberculosis,
the situation is not improved, and on the contrary, worsens? Why earlier it was
disease of hungry and cold, and today diseases are exposed to this also social-able-bodied layers of the population? Why,
then more we attack a micobacterium, the more she is
protected on the part of the nature and our immune cells (macrophages)? And such questions which are not explained from the logic point of view; which are not
explained from a position standard of theories about a tuberculosis, as about
the disease arising as a result of a lesion of an organism by a bacillus Kokh's; it is possible to give enough much.
It gives a cause to put the basic question: if such contradictions can are observed, the theory about tuberculosis is
incorrect? Experts not only are afraid to put this question; but they even are
afraid to speak about him. The existing theory is firm. The
existing theory is firm. How here to not remind about
great scientist J.Thomson's words: - From
all services which can be rendered to a science; introduction of new ideas is
the most important. But to the most important for a science is not only
introduction of new ideas, but also comprehension of perversity old.
We lose one's ability to think logically. As a rule,
making series of actions for something, or with the purpose of achievement of a
positive effect, we precisely estimate a situation. And if as a result of our
actions we have received negative (not expected result) we precisely
understand, that we have made any certain action incorrectly. There and then we
try to define him, and to correct. And only having corrected incorrect action,
we receive expected result.
And now let's act similarly in relation to
struggle against tuberculosis. What action incorrect in treatment of a tuberculosis
we make; if we receive a negative result (the number of
resistant forms marvellously experts grows))?
To find
incorrect action, let's look into; and we make what series of actions in
treatment of tuberculosis? Here and appear PARADOX. At the treatment of the tuberculosis based on the standard theory, we do
exclusively ONE ACTION. We only kill a micobacterium,
and all!!! So if we do one action and we receive a
negative result; that arises an evident and
not-refutable conclusion: we MAKE INCORRECT ACTION.
If our conclusion is true, then all existing questions
constructed on the standard theory, lose sense, and the theory is represented
incorrect.
And today it is already easy to prove this conclusion experimentally. It is
necessary to note; that, applying other approach, in struggle against tuberculosis
in the world is required much less
finances, than it is assumed by experts. Today it is already easy to prove that
officially-accepted a direction of researches for the decision of a problem of a tuberculosis, incorrectly. What
actions would not be undertaken by the countries in this direction, they will
not result in a positive result. Last years
became obvious, that many known scientists speak about necessity of the new
approach for medicine. For that the medicine does
today not only is not effective, but and is relapse; and it admits all. This approach
in official medicine is not found, and they search him not there.
And the last. So in what a principal cause of a negative situation
around of tuberculosis today? And in fact we are
mistaken, speaking about the contagious nature of tuberculosis. It also is the
real cause. The TUBERCULOSIS is a NON-infectious
DISEASE.
The new hypothesis with which it is possible to
familiarize from stuffs of this site, explains many obscure questions of a phthisiology; and not only explains a negative situation,
but also shows real ways of an exit from her. Becomes
obvious, that is necessary to change the attitude to the theory about tuberculosis. In a
basis of tubercular process lays other etiology; which considerably differs
from what is standard in medicine. To solve
a problem and to cope with such disease as a tuberculosis it already possible
in the near future, but with using other approach.