Beforehand I thank those who can correct mistakes
in grammar!!!
The
surprising symbiose
peaceful co-existence of a
tubercular infection contamination with a monocyte,
which by the nature is intended
to destroy an infection
It is very interesting fact which was repeatedly
observed in various experiments; and which till now has not found a precise explanation
in official scientific medicine. Really nobody wants to know explanations to
this phenomenon?
And can in the decision of this fact just and that answer is covered
which will allow to solve a problem of a tuberculosis?
Much to our regret; we lose one's ability to use simple logic
intellection. It is that basic error, which today; alas; frequently withdraws
from that we notice in experiments. In experiment always it is possible to find
the answer to any question which can frequently arise before us.
To admit, very much and it was very hard to find the
answer to a question - why the micobacterium peacefully symbioses (coexists) in a body of a monocyte? And not
only lives in his, and excellently propagates.
At present this phenomenon easily speaks. But, the most
interesting, that the explanation of this phenomenon has allowed to explain and
other (not less interesting) facts which also have no explanations in an
official modern science. Let's try analysing and comparing, that the common it
is observed in some facts.
So, the first fact peaceful co-existence of a micobacterium
and a monocyte in the tubercular patient which is expressed in normal
vital activity and a breeding of a micobacterium.
The second fact normal
vital activity and a breeding of a micobacterium in
the tubercular isolated formation.
The third fact - today scientists successfully
use for cultivation of micobacteria "broth"
which associates with killed boiling, cooked meat and an extract from him; i.e. cultural medium in which the dead tissue is added. Thus it is
necessary to take into account, that this method of cultivation of micobacteria (as experiments displayed) the most effective.
In his as against a usual method (1-3 individuals); multiplication of micobacteria till 30-40 individuals is reached. And in the
given fact normal vital activity
and a breeding of micobacteria is observed. This phenomenon on recognition of scientists yet has no explanation.
Let's try departing temporarily the
standard contagious theory about tuberculosis. In fact all of us perfectly
realize; that to solve any problem is one obligatory condition - it is
necessary to go out for precincts (frames) of a problem; and to examine on her
from different directions. Because, to be in inside a problem,
it is impossible to solve something.
What the common in the mentioned above facts? To answer these
questions, let's note the basic observations which are marked by scientists.
Micobacterium in an immunocyte. Only the uninjured micobacterium quietly lives in a monocyte.
And only the damaged micobacterium is exposed to an englobement, i.e. is destroyed. But she not only quietly lives in it to the murderer of foreign and own
damaged bodies; and quietly grows and propagates. Prominent
feature is that multiplication
of individuals B in a monocyte is reached in limens of 30-40
individuals. It is necessary to note still very interesting fact: at a
breeding of micobacteria during the certain moment
(due to destruction of an immunocyte) micobacteria go out to outside. Scientists consider, that
it be the result on one cause micobacteria
by the nature have property to blast monocytes. Today
the mass of assumptions (which yet have not found precise acknowledgement) expresses
one's opinion about that; how and why micobacteria
blast a monocyte. But all scientists unanimously declare that mechanisms of process of
influence of a micobacterium, as and on organism, so
and on cellular structure (including on immunocytes)
till now remain obscure. And it is the real fact.
Vital
activity of a micobacterium in isolated tubercular
formation. And it is possible to speak about this fact much. But we shall note the
most basic - the micobacterium
in isolated tubercular formation perfectly grows and propagates. And thus gives
multiplication of individuals B in isolated formation in
limens of 30-40 individuals. And so, as have shown
numerous experiments; in an organism, except a tubercular isolated formations and immune bodies,
micobacteria practically do not propagate, and are
oppressed. As we see, this basic, that unites first two facts.
Cultivation
of micobacteria with addition of a dead tissue in
cultural medium. That here is
possible to describe important. But in fact scientists have noted a
phenomenon which as they admit, till now remains not explained, in such "broth" of a micobacterium
change, will bloom and perfectly propagate; namely give multiplication in
limens of 30-40 individuals.
And now becomes obvious, that all these three facts have one important resemblance: micobacteria perfectly feel themselves,
revive, will bloom and perfectly propagate, as against other conditions. Thus
give an identical clone 30-40 individuals.
Here there is the most interesting question and what is such common in
these three facts what enables micobacteria to revive,
blossom and is perfectly to propagate?
According to the modern theory, the tuberculosis is an infectious
illness which arises because of a lesion of cells of an organism a micobacterium. For certain is known, that the lesion of
frames of an organism it is a lesion of alive organic matters. And in experiments
at cultivation of a micobacterium explorers try to
reconstitute a live culture medium (according to the infectious theory about tuberculosis).
But, alas, in live medium of a micobacterium appear depressed, badly grow and do not give
desirable multiplication. Scientists admit what to
explain it from the point of view of the contagious theory yet is not possible.
To which party do not approach and the modern theory is not capable to
answer the put questions yet. As already it has been marked above, scientists
have not unriddle a phenomenon: why at addition on
cultural medium of a dead tissue, there is a resuscitation and intensifying up
to normal, development of micobacteria and their
breeding? Is not difficult to guess, why
it was not possible to answer. If to look attentively the result is not identified with the recognized theory. In fact according
to the contagious theory of tuberculosis, a micobacterium
perfectly should feel itself in a live culture medium, and perfectly in her
propagate. But, alas.
Really is possible to solve a problem of any
disease only one assumptions, and the more so, not knowing the mechanism of
many processes of originating of disease? ...
Let's distract a little and we shall talk about the
following. More recently opponents to me have informed that proofs concerning
influences of micobacteria are perfectly submitted in
article Mycobacterium tuberculosis and the host response and in article Immunology of tuberculosis. Really very interesting stuff. But in a nem scientists again write that they only SUPPOSE. Alas, the facts are an obstinate thing. As are not fine assumptions which truly conform to an infectious role of micobacteria, they are
broken by the precise FACT.
In two named articles it would be desirable to note that
basic, that is not identified in experiment; namely in the description of
experiment with assumptions. Authors especially emphasize the following:
- Viability micobacteria of human type in the
organism and macrophages results in disputable and discordant results which
while are inexplicable,
- Despite of positive experiments on animals and in the test-tube, the
certain role, for example, an interferon (IFN-?) in protection of people
against a lesion micobacteria of human type is not clear; as it is clear in protection of an organism against other
type of micobacteria.
- Many mechanisms of this or that process including in the
attitude of "B-infection", till now
remain obscure and inexplicable.
Alas,
but today while there are no proved assumptions.
Authors, as it was already marked (and
they emphasize it) while
only suppose mechanisms of apoptosis, a immune host defense, "coexistence"
(symbiosis) of two frames (an immune cell - a micobacterium), etc.
So is still such common in these three phenomena what allows to receive
such results in experiments?
Let's carefully consider a phenomenon of cultivation of bacillus Kokh. What was a jerk to blooming micobacteria
and to their unsurpassed breeding? And in fact the answer is obvious;
scientists give the answer they have added a dead tissue, i.e. dead organic matters in a live
culture medium.
And now rather simple and obvious conclusion arises: to result in a normality
of vital activity a micobacterium (normal height and
a breeding), it is necessary to give them dead organic substances. Alas, but this obvious conclusion obviously is not identified with an
accepted contagious hypothesis about a tuberculosis.
And in
fact it is real and an incontestable fact received as a result of experiment.
Let's now pass on to vital activity of a micobacterium in isolated tubercular formation. What do we have in this fact?
It has been earlier marked;
all these three facts are bound by that in them the micobacterium
perfectly lives and propagates. Proceeding from last conclusion, follows: -
to reach normal vital activity of a micobacterium, is
necessary for her to give dead organic substances. And whether there are such
substances in isolated formation? Yes, in that continually; that is! In these formations are enough dead organic substances which, alas,
cannot be liquidated by immune system as immune bodies in them to get simply
not can. These are the residual of a necrosis of cells, etc.
Thus, and in isolated tubercular
formation in that the micobacterium grew and
perfectly propagated, there is enough of dead organic substances.
And what in third of the facts in which normal vital activity of a micobacterium and her breeding also is observed?
Fine
symbiose of a micobacterium
with an immunocyte. At first sight it seems, that
this fact leaves for limits an identification with two explained. But it at first sight, and the more so in a situation when we trust
that in a basis of a tubercular lesion a lesion of an organism a micobacterium.
Let's recollect, and what basic role of an immunocyte?
The immunocyte liquidates, englobing
(cankering) foreign microorganisms and personal pathological or damaged cells
of an organism.
Practically the immunocyte of them kills and
digests the residual. It is perfectly observed in experiment. But this firmly
shows us, that in an immunocyte practically always there is residual of alive
frames, i.e. dead organic matters. Proceeding from the
above-stated conclusions, it is obvious: the micobacterium in a monocyte
perfectly feels itself, normally lives and propagates, eating dead organic
matters.
Here
She
- essence of symbiose.
Thus, the explanation to three fine phenomena is found (symbiose of a micobacterium and a
monocyte; vital activity of a micobacterium
in isolated tubercular formation and cultivation of micobacteria
in medium with addition of dead organicsubstances). All these facts one, namely - nutrient medium for micobacteria, which basis - dead organic substances.
Conclusion:
Thus, that the official medical science till now
could not explain has been explained above.
The result of deep analysis of the above described three phenomena was
sufficient confirmation of a new hypothesis on a tuberculosis which is
described in article That itself represents tubercular process?; and which
since 2001 was repeatedly published both in press, and on different sites. But, alas, while the stuff does not produce
sufficient attention on the part of experts.
And on the end. In the beginning the interesting fact which in a modern phthisiology yet has not found sufficient confirmation has
been marked: - micobacteria, propagating, blast an immunocyte.
The new hypothesis allows to explain this phenomenon
but while there is no special a necessity to furnish any proofs. Numerous
experiments have precisely enough shown: the immunocyte,
absorbing a foreign body, blasts and englobes him. Yet there were no cases
that the immunocyte let released any body back;
except a micobacterium.
If is valid in beginning an immunocyte
protects a micobacterium; and thus gives all
conditions for her breeding; that is obvious, that it made for something, or
with any definite purpose. There is also an interesting question - and what for to enable to propagate, then to destroy? It seems, not logic and senseless question.
And if has enabled to propagate; that comes the
moment when it is necessary to give the multiplied frames to leave for
"light". And
how to leave for "light" if the immunocyte
can grasp or absorb only?
Means, there is a unique output: to let out
"multiplied", not having the conforming mechanism, it is necessary to
collapse itself. As descends actually. But to this theme it will be
possible to return only later. For for the beginning
it is necessary to comprehend a new hypothesis. And in fact the science knows
enough fact when the frame which gives life, the destruction lets releases
brooding in "light".
I ask the reader to not hurry up to do premature conclusions. I ask to
take into account also, that the conforming experiments proving the basic idea
which is stated in a new hypothesis about tuberculosis are analysed.
And the result of any experiment always was and is the incontestable proof.
2006.